View Using Legal Project Management to Extend an E-discovery Practice Group to a Firm-wide Competency - Legal Project Management
Legal Project Management: Thoughts, tips, and discoveries related to the management of legal projects.

Using Legal Project Management to Extend an E-discovery Practice Group to a Firm-wide Competency

| Comments | 3 TrackBacks

The American Lawyer recently published an interesting article about the increasing number of law firms that are creating e-discovery counsel positions and setting up e-discovery practice groups and task forces.[1] There are a variety of models described, but what they all seem to share in common is that there are one or more attorneys and staff who focus full or part time on e-discovery issues, which act as a go-to resource for the rest of the firm and its clients. The problem with this approach is pointed out by the always-astute George Socha:

[J]ust having an e-discovery practice group doesn't mean that the entire firm has a grasp on e-discovery. 'The general goal for firms is to have a standardized approach to handling e-discovery," says Socha. 'They don't just need a practice group, they need every lawyer practicing e-discovery.'"

E-discovery should be a core competency for any attorney--it is just legal discovery for the modern world. If you want to practice law in the information age, you need to understand the basics of identifying, preserving, collecting, analyzing, and presenting electronic evidence. While it makes sense to have a practice group or resident expert to help set firm-wide policies and practices, and to act as a resource for particularly complex discovery matters, this resource should not serve to replace the responsibility of individual attorneys. This is analogous to firms with privilege experts or teams, who are charged with keeping on top of new developments in privilege law, understanding the most arcane applications of that law, and developing and promulgating best practices for protecting privilege at the firm. The existence of such a position does not, however, mean that other members of the firm can delegate away their professional duty to understand and protect client confidences.

Yet too many attorneys see e-discovery as "tech stuff" to delegate to the firm's resident geek lawyer. This is an increasingly dangerous attitude. Some level of understanding is required to even know when you need help from the e-discovery practice group and what questions to ask. Therefore, the primary role of an "e-discovery" practice group should be to design, promulgate, and monitor compliance with firm-wide e-discovery standards. E-discovery counsel should be "legal knowledge workers" in the sense that futurist Richard Susskind uses the term: "people who create, monitor, and progressively elaborate on the standardized processes and documents."[2]

This is where legal-project-management and process-improvement capabilities are important. The occasional CLE course and firm-wide memo are not enough. Firms who have project-management systems in place are in a better position to bake e-discovery best practices into the management of their legal matters. This is also an example, I think, of where it makes more sense to focus on project management before process improvement. 

Even though e-discovery processes are especially suited for process-improvement efforts, a firm first needs to ensure that its attorneys know they need to make the effort to determine what e-discovery tasks are required. Attorneys need to include e-discovery considerations into their planning activities for (nearly) every litigation matter. Project management systems used by attorneys trained in legal-project management will greatly facilitate the promulgation and enforcement of firm-wide e-discovery standards.

[1] Irene Plagianos, Law Firms Staff Experts to Manage EDD, The American Lawyer, Friday, October 22, 2010, (last visited 10/27/2010).

[2] Paul C. Easton, Tomorrows Corporate Lawyers: Some thoughts on Richard Susskind's Five Categories, Legal Project Management, Sunday, October 18, 2009, (last visited 10/27/2010), citing Richard Susskind, Five Types of Corporate Lawyers Predicted for the Future, The Corporate Lawyer, Monday, October 19, 2009, (last visited 10/27/2010).


Enhanced by Zemanta

3 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL:

My interest in project management grew out of my e-discovery practice and desire to more effectively manage large, complex discovery projects. So I always enjoy reading what others in the industry have to say about e-discovery project management. Toda... Read More

A reader asks:  I have worked as a document review attorney for a number of years. I'm interested in developing my career in the ediscovery area, beyond doing document review. I would appreciate some advice regarding this, such as what career opti... Read More

On April 28th, the New York City Bar will host a CLE presentation by Aileen Leventon on how lawyers can use legal-project management to advance their careers. Title: "IMPLEMENTING PROJECT MANAGEMENT TO ADVANCE YOUR CAREER"  Format/Location: ... Read More

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Paul C. Easton published on October 27, 2010 12:47 PM.

ILTA White Paper and 2010 Survey on Legal Project Management was the previous entry in this blog.

ILTA White Paper and 2010 Survey on Legal Project Management, Part II is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.